Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Prosperity Pathways
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-19 18:37:16
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- A U.S. Virgin Islands Oil Refinery Had Yet Another Accident. Residents Are Demanding Answers
- New York and New England Need More Clean Energy. Is Hydropower From Canada the Best Way to Get it?
- Soft Corals Are Dying Around Jeju Island, a Biosphere Reserve That’s Home to a South Korean Navy Base
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- World Meteorological Organization Sharpens Warnings About Both Too Much and Too Little Water
- This $23 Travel Cosmetics Organizer Has 37,500+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
- 20,000 roses, inflation and night terrors: the life of a florist on Valentine's Day
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Q&A: Gov. Jay Inslee’s Thoughts on Countering Climate Change in the State of Washington and Beyond
Ranking
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Adidas is looking to repurpose unsold Yeezy products. Here are some of its options
- Our 2023 valentines
- Missing Sub Passenger Stockton Rush's Titanic Connection Will Give You Chills
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- You'll Unconditionally Love Katy Perry's Latest Hair Transformation
- Senators are calling on the Justice Department to look into Ticketmaster's practices
- How Much Did Ancient Land-Clearing Fires in New Zealand Affect the Climate?
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
What we know about Rex Heuermann, suspect in Gilgo Beach murders that shook Long Island more than a decade ago
The 26 Words That Made The Internet What It Is (Encore)
A power outage at a JFK Airport terminal disrupts flights
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Rep. Ayanna Pressley on student loans, the Supreme Court and Biden's reelection - The Takeout
An Offshore Wind Farm on Lake Erie Moves Closer to Reality, but Will It Ever Be Built?
Race, Poverty, Farming and a Natural Gas Pipeline Converge In a Rural Illinois Township